Now that the weekend is here, I've been catching up on the news of this weeks big astronomy announcement: the discovery of a possible "Super-Earth" exo-planet, Gliese 581 c. This is the first exoplanet likely to be within the so-called "Habitable zone" around its star, where life as we know it could be possible. Unfortunately the Irish Times "World Apart" weekend supplement article has been quite disappointing.

Like Greg Laughlin at UCO Lick I get depressed when people give misleading information . It includes a very misleading "Artists impression" picture, simultaneously showing details we don't know and being incorrect about the few things we do know.

Its easy to get annoyed at the concentration of facts that are guesswork or probably wrong in this article. Gl 581c is not 5 Earth masses: thats its minimum mass: due to radial velocity measurements, we can only measure M sin(i), where i is the inclination, currently unknown. It could easily be far more, and hence all predictions of what the planet is like become moot.

Similarly, the radius is not necessarily 1.5 times Earths: thats a prediction, based on the mass, and current theories. Unfortunately, there is no mention that current theories of planetary size are coming under scrutiny as they fail to match other recent exoplanet discoveries. This makes other speculation about the planet such as the gravity on the surface quite misleading.

The BBC News summary is much better: it refers to the radius as "the radius should be", rather than "is". But it too includes the incorrect picture. While its article is couched in more conservative language, it doesn't explain what facts it quotes are speculation and why they may be wrong.

None of the media reports I have yet seen mention current missions, such as COROT, which is the most likely to find Earth-sized planets in the near future (launched late last year, it is due to finish its first observing run in April. Results awaited with anticipation). They also ignore Darwin and the The Terrestrial Planet Finder, the most likely missions to discover life on other planets, but currently sitting in funding limbo.

Concentration on purely the known facts would of course make the news reports short and boring. Instead they should emphasise more of the work of the scientists involved: we teach science as a set of cut-and-dried facts that often bore school students and drive them away.

Instead, when faced as the cutting edge of an important discovery like this, we could show how an amateur could be partially credited with getting this result; with the fact that, since the planet has a short "year" astronomers are already lining up to investigate transit measurements of it on May 7 and that with a magnitude of 10.6 (only 20 light years from Earth, after all) its within range of amateur astronomers to observe and determine its true size and details. How about getting people excited to get involved themselves?