Thu, 20 Aug 2009

In this weeks Astronomy & Astrophysics was a paper by M. Reidemeister et al., A possible architecture of the planetary system HR 8799.
This revisits HR 8799, one of the few planetary systems seen by direct imaging, actually observing the planets.
These are believed to be three Jupiter-sized planets (of about 5, 7 and 7 times the mass of Jupiter: the exact numbers depend on the precise viewing angle from Earth; Reidmeister think this is nearly pole-on). They were discovered last year by Marois et al..
Summarizing all available data, they decide that HR 8799 is less that 50 Million years old, practically still forming. Their proposed layout of the system has at least three dust rings, still coalescing and cooling. By comparison, our Solar system at that stage had formed the main planets but the four outer giants were still moving into position, working their way through the remains of a dusty, gassy disk : another 500 million years or so before Jupiter and Saturn settled into their current orbits, and bombarding the inner system as they did so, leading to the cratering we see on the moon and resurfacing Mars, Earth and Venus.
What makes the HR 8799 system so interesting is that its a good test for theories of planetary or stellar formation. Its unclear whether it formed as a 'planetary system', with the planets formed in the debris disk of the star, or as a "multiple star" system; for the latter. Modelling the formation of HR 8799 will be a good test of Alan Boss's 'Gravitational Instability' theory, vs the 'core accretion' model which has been gaining ground in recent years.
In the meantime for non-theorists, its pole-on orientation gives us a good view of planets in formation. Roll-on the clearer images of the James Webb Space Telescope.
Tue, 21 Apr 2009
From the exoplanets mailing list:
Gliese 581d is now more solidly inside the habitable zone; it was considered before to be on the outer edge of the habitable zone (this work moves its believed semi-major axis from 0.25 AU to 0.22 AU). Gliese 581d was a maybe for habitability (see this Centauri dreams article for example), depending on cloud cover, etc. Now its definitely in. The new Gl 581e is beyond the classical habitable zone.
These planets are quite close in: Rory Barnes and colleagues at Lunar and Planetary Laboratory in Arizona did some good work on the habitability of Gliese 581 c (paper online) and concluded that it would be tidally heated to such a degree it was probably never habitable. Such tidal heating might make Gl 581e habitable; time to run the model again.
Correction: On reading the ESO Press release and paper (via) it appears that Gl 581e is inside the orbit of Gl 581b, and too close to the star to be habitable. To date, planets have been labelled b, c, d .. as they are discovered, and they've been discovered shortest-period first, so 'b' also meant closest to the star. Now Gl 581e is closest to the star, with a period of 3 days.
Thu, 13 Dec 2007
So, SpaEurope blog reports, with independent confirmation at Dynamics of Cats, that the CoRoT team is ready to do a press release and conference on the 20th December.
Now to go convince my PhD Supervisor to hold off 'til after christmas for the Lit. Review. I suspect he will be devasated to have a hole open in his calendar right in the middle of a week when (undergrad) students are away, and all he has on his Todo list is his own research ...
Wed, 12 Dec 2007
So, the CoRoT team apparently had a meeting in Paris on Monday. I've been waiting with baited breath (and intermittent internet access, for assorted reasons) for the results of a "Press Conference", that according to the blogosphere rumour mill, and a (started by a breathless interim report) was going to rewrite the sciences of exoplanets and stellar seismology. There were rumours of special editions of Nature (or Science, or A & A), Earth-mass planets (possible according to the apparent spec. of CoRoT).
This mattered to me as I'm finishing up a literature review for a PhD and the work is on exoplanets, and depends a lot on stellar variation. CoRoT could rewrite large sections of my conclusions. So, it looks like I finish my review and just have to be patient while they release their results in the proper peer-reviewed manner.
But it would probably be a good idea for the CoRoT team to set up a blog, as Rumour Central, to respond to mentions and rumours about their project that appear on the 'net. Kudos, for example, to Wesley Traub for taking the time to answer my questions aboout Darwin/TPF in this manner.
Sun, 21 Oct 2007
I see from the BBC and /. that ESA has made its choices in Cosmic Vision 2015-2025. It appears that Darwin did not make the cut.
Istead, PLATO and SPICA seem to be holding the banner for exoplanetary exploration.
Can someone closer to the decision-making process comment? What does this mean for NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder? There were considerations of merging Darwin and TPF; does the project live as TPF, or was the task of imaging an exoplanet left to JWST ?
Fri, 25 May 2007
Outflows have been discovered from a Brown Dwarf star, 2MASS1207-3932, the lightest yet.
Found by Emma Whelan and Tom Ray of DIAS and others , using the ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT), this is the first time that Jets have been seen from an astronomical object as small as this.
The Brown Dwarf is 2MASS1207-3932, a 24-Jupiter mass 'near star'. Jets of material are a common feature in astrophysics, seen from Galaxies and young stars, but this is the first time they have been seen in something this small. It opens the possibility of similar outflows from smaller objects, such as giant planets.
The brown dwarf 2MASS1207-3932 is full of surprises. Its companion, a 5 Jupiter-mass giant, was the first confirmed exoplanet for which astronomers could obtain an image, thereby opening a new field of research - the direct detection of alien worlds. It was then later found that the brown dwarf has a disc surrounding it, not unlike very young stars.
Fri, 04 May 2007
Greg Laughlin from UCO Lick pointed out that there is a transit possible of Gliese 581c on May7. Looking at the ephemeris, its at 17:13 UT, though: not very good for those of us in Ireland. Yesterdays Nature (subscription required) shows that someone is going one better:
They reckon on 50/1 against a transit, on geometrical grounds. Good luck to them though.
The point of all of this is that the current planetary detections of Gliese 581b and 581c are Doppler radial velocity measurements. While they tell us the period, they only give us a lower bound on the mass : 581c is at least 5 Earth masses, but could be much more (its M Sin(i), where i is the inclination relative to us is unknown). We also don't know the radius of the planet : the figure quoted in the news articles to date is just a guess based on 5 Earth masses and current theory. A transit measurement, where the planet passes in front of the star, could answer these questions.
But it occurs to be we could get numbers tonight: there is a transit (alignment) of Gliese 581b tonight at 22:40 UT. Much more favourable to those of us in Europe.
A transit of GL 581b, the big neighbour of Gl 581c, would tell is that a transit of 581c is likely, and would give us an accurate mass for 581b, and from this, a measure of the inclination. So we could also calculate the mass of 581b.
Unfortunately I don't have a photometer or CCD. Anyone else up for it?
Clear Skies over Ireland forecast , too ...
Sat, 17 Mar 2007
Looking for Earths: The Race to Find New Solar Systems is an excellent introduction book, as a scientific story of exploration and summary of the science of planetary discovery.
Alan Boss is a planetary scientist and adviser to NASA on the search for extrasolar planets. He has had a front-row seat in the revolution over the last two decades that has led to the discovery planets outside our Solar system for the first time, leading to 215 known planets at last counting.
The book is written in an first-person style that reflects the race to discover the first exoplanets in the 1990s. He describes historical searches for planets in the early 20th Century: the hunt for evidence of planets around Barnards Stara and the meticulous work over decades of Peter Van de Kamp, a good summary of the challenges in proving the case for planets in Astronomy, and explains the techniques used to determine other planets. The heartbreaking difficulties of proving the discovery are well expressed, as well as documenting the leaders of the field at the time. Along the way, he describes the discovery of the first Brown Dwarfs, the border cases between Stars and Planets, and the bureaucratic and other challenges involved in setting up large observatories such as the Keck interferometers capable of doing this work.
This is ironic, as the first discoveries were actually made by ground-based observatories. Boss describes the race between the main teams, Geoffrey Marcy and Paul Butler of Lick observatory. The race was finally won by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz of Geneva Observatory, who discovered the first extrasolar planet around a sun-like star, 51 Pegasi, by looking at radial velocity measurements of nearby stars. This turned out to be a close race, as the planet they had found had a short period of 4.23 days, implying the planet was what we now call a "hot Jupiter", orbiting very close into the Sun. Most teams had been looking for copies of our Solar system, looking for large planets such as Jupiter with orbits of around a decade, and had hence not started to analyse the data they had in hand, expecting to need years of measurements: examining the data showed that, had they analysed data in hand, they could have won.
Looking for Earths does a good job of explaining the field of exoplanet research as it was evolving over Boss's careeer and particularly 1995-2005, with theoretical and computer models evolving as data arrived with new puzzles. In some places, the need to give a clear explanation of a topic such as the formation of planets from solar disks slows the pace of the biography, but the book does an excellent job of describing both the science and the life lived by those doing the work. Few books I've read have offered such a good summary of the field to date, along with a good bibliography and I would heartily recommend it both as an introduction to the field and as a model for science writing.